I think you are all missing the point.
In 2007 I expressed my disappointment that Mike Curiak imposed rules on entrants that he would not support if they experienced trouble. He legally formalised rules and regulations for an event without covering himself against litigation. It is no surprise that Matt has not painted himself into this corner, but there is something deeper to it than that.
If you want to keep the self-sufficient ethos of this event, you all need to back away and ask yourselves what you got out of it. If you have completed the trail and the best part of it all was winning that year, setting a record or telling others of your accomplishment, you should go and do it again.
As entrant numbers increase, as rules and compliance increases, as the population along the route becomes more aware of riders, as more information about setups, preparation and the route is shared, the trail becomes sanitised from adventure. I seek my Divide experience again, but it will not be found in familiar territory.
It is my hope that the TourDivide event withers and dies. It will continue to provide inspiration to those willing to race or tour the trail for their own comparison, and to those who seek adventure in local or foreign lands, but there is no improvement from its current form. Success on the Divide needs to be measured in experience gained, not as a finishing time, not as a badge to wear - I come here to read the stories and see the photos of riders, there doesn't need to be an event to do that.