Someone recently said that "this great race suffers from a deficit in administration..."
I'm a little new to this, but isn't that part of the point? There are plenty of other races out there with heavy organization and high fees.
I was really surprised when I got out there, and started hearing from Matthew at all- I received texts telling me when it was time to replace batteries in my Spot Trace, and one telling me that the Sapillo Alternate was actually open. It was nice, but despite paying a trackleaders registration, I wasn't expecting any of that.
And results- who cares? Is that really the reason some people line up? The results that matter (if any do) are already easy to find- Jeffe and Alice won, Dan was first single speed.
Sure, I'll remember that I was 9th overall and 2nd SS, and maybe my mom and my girlfriend care, but beyond that I realize that the rest of the world (even the rest of the endurance mountain bike community) probably doesn't give a crap.
I think the leaderboard on trackleaders is enough as far as published results go.
This is a great event, but it's in a really grey area. I think that the more "administered" it becomes, the closer it's going to get to being shut down- especially when riders end up needing help, get hypothermic, and so on.