Pages: [1] 2
Reply Reply New Topic New Poll
  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands on: February 05, 2010, 12:01:02 PM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« on: February 05, 2010, 12:01:02 PM »

Having recently completed (more or less) a discussion on racks (http://www.bikepacking.net/forum/index.php/topic,622.0.html), elsewhere on the Forums, I figured I'd better move on to the subject of what panniers to put ON them.

I haven't ruled out the possibility of making some bags myself, (at least as a long-term crafts project), but to start with, maybe I should ask about prevailing favorites in the "bought" category.  For example, Arkel (http://www.arkel-od.com/)  seems to have a pretty generous variety available; how's their reputation around these parts?  And how many other brands are in use around here?
 
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 12:32:41 PM
bmike-vt


Location: Horgen, Switzerland
Posts: 1122


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 12:32:41 PM »

http://www.ortliebusa.com/
Logged


  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 03:38:56 PM
sean salach


Location: palmer, ak
Posts: 253


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 03:38:56 PM »

I never had a problem with my Jandd Large Mountain Panniers. They fit a ton of stuff though, so overpacking is really easy for anything but a really long tour.
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #3 on: February 06, 2010, 04:56:56 AM
AZTtripper
Moderator


Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1732


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2010, 04:56:56 AM »

I still have the Jandd Mountain Panniers I used for the AZT in 2004. I really like the way they attach (no bungee cords) rock solid once you crank down on the strap. Most Jandd stuff is over built to last a life time, that's the down side though as they weigh a ton. Of course we have been over this on the rack thread. Since you are not a weight weenie that shouldn't be an issue.

I no longer have the REI set that was on the back but if you can find them they worked ok slightly bigger then the Jandd ones but not as tough but lighter. And though they didn't have bungee's the straps didn't provide the same torque as Jandd and I had to use string to tie them on (not a problem on roads just on the trail).

I would highly recommend Jandd products for heavy duty applications I also have their Rack Pack Duffel for a light weight option. http://www.jandd.com/detail.asp?PRODUCT_ID=FDRP
 


* Along the Apache Trail.JPG (196.7 KB, 1024x768 - viewed 284 times.)
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #4 on: February 06, 2010, 09:00:48 AM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2010, 09:00:48 AM »

That Rac Pac looks like something that might be useful, right here in town.  Thanks for the link.
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #5 on: February 06, 2010, 12:02:03 PM
AZTtripper
Moderator


Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1732


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2010, 12:02:03 PM »

Even off the bike I use it to pack my bike cloths when I load up in a friends rig to drive to a TH.
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #6 on: February 06, 2010, 12:50:27 PM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2010, 12:50:27 PM »

Well, that *is* one of the keys to picking wilderness gear, in general: use multi-purpose items.  Thanks again.

In the meantime, I'm checking out reviews for panniers, both here and elsewhere, and those Arkels still look pretty appealing.  For a truly all-out expedition, a set of XM-45s on the rear, and XM-28s on the front, sounds like a lot of cargo capacity.....and I can order my OMM racks off the same site!  But we're not decided yet........
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #7 on: February 06, 2010, 01:35:51 PM
AZTtripper
Moderator


Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1732


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2010, 01:35:51 PM »

Well the Arkels look pretty good not too impressed with bungee's as hold down system but it looks like the cam system under the hook should make up for the lack of a Jandd style strap down system. A little pricey though.
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #8 on: February 06, 2010, 02:58:01 PM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2010, 02:58:01 PM »

Yes; the price has been noted in other reviews.  It's also noted that some brands are easier to strap on, but no one has faulted their solidity.  Basically, price has been the only serious drawback anyone's mentioned.

Having said that, Jandd and Ortlieb seem to have plenty of fans in their own right.  I think that Ortlieb was the one with the highest rating for quality of attachment (both ease AND strength), and Jandd seems to have a solid reputation as a reliable, if plain-jane, maker.  Like I said, we're not "decided," just yet; there seem to be plenty of options.
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #9 on: February 06, 2010, 06:45:54 PM
wdlandparker


Location: Woodland Park, CO
Posts: 104


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2010, 06:45:54 PM »

jannd stuff is nice icon_biggrin
Logged

"what now ma nature, what now hahaha?!?!"
(cue hailstorm)

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #10 on: February 06, 2010, 08:38:00 PM
sean salach


Location: palmer, ak
Posts: 253


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2010, 08:38:00 PM »

............ I think that Ortlieb was the one with the highest rating for quality of attachment (both ease AND strength), and Jandd seems to have a solid reputation as a reliable, if plain-jane, maker.  Like I said, we're not "decided," just yet; there seem to be plenty of options.

I don't know if I would call the Jandd bags 'plain-jane compared to the Ortliebs. The Ortlieb stuff is really good, but really simple. They're basically dry bags with some plastic mounting hardware attached, whereas the Jandd bags are a more comprehensive and 'customizable' set up. The Ortliebs seem like they would be lacking in the ability to strap extra gear to them when and if necessary. I found it very convenient to strap wet clothes to the tops of them or in the mesh pockets to dry, and if in an area where I would worry about people messing with my bike when I couldn't see it, I just strapped my dirty socks and my grungiest pare of cycling shorts to the top of em. Cheesy There's also an assortment of attachment points for adding pannier or back pack 'pockets'.

For simplicity, Ortlieb wins, for versatility, I would go with Jandd and just line it with a trash bag.
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #11 on: February 06, 2010, 08:45:20 PM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2010, 08:45:20 PM »

The trash bag was a given, whatever I buy. Wink

I guess I used the term, "plain," since Jandd is the label that every bike shop seems to carry; one therefore inclines to think of it as "regular," as opposed to being something "extra."  And looking at them, carrying 2 sets of the Mountain Panniers, in different sizes (Large+Standard?  Standard+Mini?), would probably carry enough.  It's just a matter of looking at all the little details......
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #12 on: February 09, 2010, 03:51:29 PM
mijome07


Location: Southern California
Posts: 20


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2010, 03:51:29 PM »

All the bags I ever bought were Jandd. Quality stuff. Never had any problems. Plus, them being in San Diego, I'm able to support a So Cal company. 
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #13 on: February 10, 2010, 03:04:59 AM
intheways


Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2010, 03:04:59 AM »

Up here in the Cascades, the Ortlieb packs are great for fending off the occasional rain shower Wink
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #14 on: February 23, 2010, 08:32:38 AM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2010, 08:32:38 AM »

Ooo!!!  I think I just found another option: CARRADICE!
http://www.carradice.co.uk/categories/superc

Appealingly old-fashioned, cotton-duck construction, a pre-WWII pedigree, even more capacity than the Arkels (54 oz.!), and they're not only distributors of OMM racks, but they go with Brooks saddles, as well!

My, my; the choices are just dizzying! icon_biggrin
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #15 on: February 23, 2010, 10:22:09 AM
bmike-vt


Location: Horgen, Switzerland
Posts: 1122


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2010, 10:22:09 AM »

Carradice makes nice stuff - if a bit heavy. I've run a SuperC saddlebag, a Camper Longflap, and a Barley. I also have a rain cape for commuting round town. I moved away from the Carradice saddlebags toward the Epic bags... A friend has their panniers and runs them for commuting. Personally for expedition quality stuff I'm a fan of the Ortlieb when it comes to panniers...
Logged


  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #16 on: February 23, 2010, 11:46:15 AM
GreenBikeGuy

"It's not that easy, bein' green....."


Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2010, 11:46:15 AM »

Nice to hear that they're well-accepted.  But since we've heard before that you favor the Ortliebs, could you tell me me more about what you like about them?
Logged

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #17 on: February 23, 2010, 02:32:28 PM
bmike-vt


Location: Horgen, Switzerland
Posts: 1122


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2010, 02:32:28 PM »

waterproof if you keep em vertical on the bike. (even better with the roll tops)
rock solid mounting mechanisms.
very well crafted.
easy open / close.
very durable. we've used the large panniers for 5+ years now mixed commuting / groceries / utility and a few overnights with no sign of wear.



the carradice stuff is nice.
it can be tricky to find stateside depending on shipping from UK, etc.
very well made.

after all weather riding i hated the buckle and leather strap system (not sure what they use on the panniers...)
very finicky to open / close with cold wet hands.
i liked the superc design of the saddle bags with plastic clips and adjustable straps far better than the leather vareity.


here's a long comment reply on my blog about all the bags i've used in the last few years. it focused on the acron bags (similar to carradice, riv, and banjo brothers) - but applies to this discussion


Quote
forget my previous comment, here it is. I’ll post a full up review and compare contrast as a full post if I get the time… I’m a bag whore… Wink

Mainly style issues – as anything I’ve used ‘works’ to carry stuff. And by style I mean in the color / looks department as well as the approach – mounting, compressing, supporting – side of things.

The Acorn saddlepack that I used was the smallish / medium version. Leather trim, buckles, zippers, and leather pulls and bits for mounting a blinky. Transported from bike to bike easily but required bag loops, flopped around a bit when loaded, regardless of how I cinched it down.

The Acorn Boxy Rando bag was built to high quality, with the same leather bits and trim and metal hooks and fasteners. Map case on top that was an odd size (8.5 x 11 didn’t quite fit folded in half) – and it leaked around the seams. Cotton duck. Stabilizer chords, etc. The Acorn front bag required a rack (I was using the Nitto Mark’s) and I had to either use a decaleur or the stabilizers to the hoods. Easy access on the go to pretty much the whole bag. Food in the back small pockets, larger items in the main pouch. ID, wallet, etc. in the front flap. Still found myself stopping, esp. when moving slow or being tired to do any major bag searches / gear changes.

The Acorn’s are overall heavier per unit of volume that you can carry – and the front bag doesn’t swap from bike to bike easily – you have to move racks and possibly lights (I had my eDeluxe mounted on the rack)… add in the rack weight and it adds considerably to unbalanced equation of volume carried to weight of pack.*

*Note – I’m not a weight weenie (I do look in the mirror every morning) – but on a Fleche, 300k or climby 200k all that stuff adds up – and I’ve been trying to streamline and lighten my load since about mid summer… it all adds up and plays into the bigger picture. Especially now that I’ve started to pair down my kit and am pressing to do some bikepacking style fast touring next year. I’m no racer, and folks would still scoff at what I end up carrying – but if I have the room I tend to fill it up. I’d load up the Acorn front bag… regardless. And the rear would be fine for most riding. Could stuff a jacket in there when needed, along with tools, some calories, phone, camera, etc.

Materials: Buckles and leather and such certainly fit the traditional look of the Carradice and Acorn bags (and Ostrich and VO) – but in the rain and the cold are a PITA. A 24 hour Fleche, most in the rain and cold turned me off to this (along with plenty of training rides in the wet / snow / cold). While the front bag is easy to flip open – anytime I wanted into the rear (and this goes for plenty of winter riding with the Carradice) you’d be removing gloves, fiddling with buckles and straps, etc… I’m just done with that for now… I like the snap closures of the plastic on the Epics. Roll things tight, snap em closed, pull the compression straps. Simple. Elegant. Pack it stuffed full… or half empty and you can still snug it up. The Carradice and Acorn’s hold their shape regardless of what is in them, and unless on a Bagman rack they tend to flop around a bit when stuffed (and stuff flops around in them when not so stuffed). While I liked the easy access pockets on the Barley (and still have a Barley and Camper Longflap to use if I want) they don’t keep things even remotely dry unless they are packed tight – otherwise the canvas kind of keeps its own shape. I did get remotely good at opening and closing the side pockets while on the go… and could work the buckles sans gloves while moving… but…

Leather – the black and brown leather on the Acorn’s (and white and black of the Carradice) certainly look sharp. But I somehow always felt I was riding a fully dressed Harley around. Perhaps this is PTSD from my DNF 400k that happened during Laconia bike week where I was passed by hundreds of ‘loud pipes save lives’ (complete with tassels, trim, skulls and such) bikes on a brevet… but the fashionista in me just always felt off about the leather and canvas stuff strapped all over my Ti IF. Pockets and doodads and leather zipper pulls with leather trim and on and on… too much for me. Functional, yes, for sure. But combined with issues above and it just stopped working for me. Aside from my saddle – I don’t think I need leather elsewhere (although I am eyeing a pair of ‘driving’ gloves for riding… something thin but grippy)

Front weight – with the previous Acorn setup most of the gear weight went into the front – this is on top of rack + bag weight. It was stable enought. I had bombed descents at 38 mph no hands on rough surfaces snapping pics with no shimmy or a hint of wobble… slow handling suffered for sure… but it was all workable. But I always felt the weight up there – even psychologically when the bag was empty everything felt slow and heavy… I’d guess that both Epic systems weigh as much as the Acorn saddle pack alone (don’t quote me, I’d have to weigh it and look it up) – but for sure the rear offers 3x the capacity with plenty of options for how you trim it up or down.

I’m a fan of ‘modern’ materials for bags and such, and I mainly stick to wool for clothing. Wink I’ll write more after I get some use time with the new gear … but aside from the generous size (I might have to have Eric make me a small h-bar pack sans harness system (sort of like a cape roll) and a 1/2 sized seat bag – I think this setup will be a winner. Lots of room in the rear to turn the bike into a self supported fast (relative to me turning the pedals) touring / rando / dirt road exploring machine. I’m fairly certain with an upgraded sleeping bag or quilt I’ll get my sleep system (hammock, bag, insulating layers) in the harness on the bars and can use the rear for tools (packed tight to the saddle) and clothing and layers packed as we move out from the post. I also have a Jandd frame pack to add to the mix if needed.

Bags I’ve used:

Ortlieb Medium and Large seat pack: waterproof, great bags, horrible mounting mechanism that doesn’t work with Brooks saddles (although I can get it to work with the Swallow (long rails) – but it doesn’t sit like it should.

Carradice SQR Tour – excellent bag, cotton duck, huge! The mounting block weighs more than my new bags… similar capacity in a boxier format to the Epic tailbag

Ortlieb h-bar bag – great bag, waterproof, great map case. Love it… but it mounts high on the bars and doesn’t expand very well. It also holds it shape, so its always boxy regardless of how full it is. Hard to move from bike to bike. Great for exploring and such. I still have it and it will probably adorn my wife’s Salsa come spring.

Ortlieb panniers – I had a full kit – front and rear of the bikepacker plus. Love them. Traded off the smalls to a frend and the large rears ride on the wife’s Salsa. If I were a pannier using world tourist – these would be the bags to use.

Carradice Barley traditional – like the size and was pleased with the mounting. Used a bagman for it on the IF for brevets and fully loaded. Sans bagman on the fixed gear for around town. Tired of the buckles… sold it this summer.

Carradice Barley Super C design – just picked one up recently. Used it for a brevet and long summer ride. Snap clips work well, bag is shaped a bit differently than their traditional bags – the top has a shape / seams to it that make it odd to close up unless stuffed – and it seems harder to tuck things under that big flap on the traditional version. I’ll probably keep this around for the FG.

Carradice Camper Long Flap – HUGE bag. Buckles and leather as noted prior. Have a bagman expedition for it. Works as described. Can swallow enough gear to camp with. Can swallow a ton of groceries…. its in the stable but rarely gets used…

Acorn saddlebag – noted above

Acorn boxy rando bag – noted above

Each piece offers something to various uses… and I guess if I were to design something (sketched out plenty of ideas… but I’m not a sewing man) it would be a cross between the Carradice SQR Tour and the Ortlieb seat packs. I think the Epic does this… and some time will tell.
Logged


  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #18 on: February 23, 2010, 05:02:16 PM
Done


Posts: 1434


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2010, 05:02:16 PM »

Has anyone ever had durability problems with the plastic clips on Ortlieb bags? They seem convenient, but they also seem fragile compared to straps. Thanks!
Logged

"Done"

  Topic Name: Pannier & bag brands Reply #19 on: February 23, 2010, 05:07:17 PM
bmike-vt


Location: Horgen, Switzerland
Posts: 1122


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2010, 05:07:17 PM »

I haven't - and they pop off and are replaceable...

These folks have used em for a long time on a world tour.

And another page where they sing their praises...

These folks used them for a 3 yr world tour...
Logged

  Pages: [1] 2
Reply New Topic New Poll
Jump to: