Pages: [1]
Reply Reply New Topic New Poll
  Topic Name: Rigid or susp. frames? on: April 14, 2010, 07:07:01 AM
Erichimedes


Location: sometimes in Durango, CO
Posts: 3


View Profile
« on: April 14, 2010, 07:07:01 AM »

Hi everyone, let me introduce myself. My name's Eric, I'm from Durango, CO, and I'm an avid road tourist and old bike aficionado. However, the concept of touring off-road didn't occur to me until just recently. What a fantastic idea! So I'm going to get out on the trails for a few trips this summer, but I'm still in learning mode right now. I have an old rigid rockhopper that I run with big fat tires, and I love it. I'm planning on getting a frame bag on that and using it.

My question is, do you guys mostly run suspension or rigid mtbs? What would you prefer for bikepacking over dayriding and why?
Logged

  Topic Name: Rigid or susp. frames? Reply #1 on: April 15, 2010, 06:54:01 AM
AZTtripper
Moderator


Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1732


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2010, 06:54:01 AM »

I am currently riding a steel hardtail with front suspension. I have also had full suspension but for my riding style front is enough.

It depends on the trails you want to ride but a full rigid bike can be a real tooth rattling experience. Not that it can't be done but I would have to say that having at least a front shock is the most common way to roll.
Logged

  Topic Name: Rigid or susp. frames? Reply #2 on: April 15, 2010, 09:21:58 AM
Outsider


Location: Finland
Posts: 75


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2010, 09:21:58 AM »

I prefer both. On technical trails, there is nothing like a full suspension bike. A rigid bike is not much fun on trails that are full of rocks and roots, though it is still possible to ride with one. Front suspension might also be enough. OTOH I'm looking forward to do some mixed terrain rides with my fully rigid Fargo this summer. For gravel roads with some technical trails mixed in it should be nice, but for a full day's ride of technical singletrack I will use my FS 29er.

It all depends on the trails you want to ride.
Logged

My bike blog: www.yetirides.com

  Topic Name: Rigid or susp. frames? Reply #3 on: April 20, 2010, 09:11:01 PM
bartspedden


Location: Crested Butte, CO
Posts: 257


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2010, 09:11:01 PM »

For most of the terrain in Colorado I really appreciate my full suspension setup.  The rear travel is just a blast on the rocky downhill sections, on the soft pine needle laden burmy corners, on the little jumps where I can get some air. Getting the chance to pump every ounce of speed out of trail is just pure fun! Additionally, I like the dampening effect on long trails for my back.  And for a fork I couldn't say more good things about the benefits of an adjustable fork.  Mine adjusts between 90mm and 130mm and makes a HUGE difference for me on the climbs versus DH.  Some of the trails around Crested Butte are just fine with a hard tail (i.e. 401), but for most of Colorado I prefer a FS.  The weight difference of a HT versus a FS just doesn't make a big enough argument for me and my riding style. I can lock out my rear. I can lock out my fork. My fork travel adjusts for climbing and downhill.  The variations allow me to adjust for my personal needs as well as the needs of the trail.  In three years of abuse none of xc suspension parts have failed.

As for bikebacking versus day riding - I use the same bike for both because the same bike works really well for almost everything I ride... it comes down to adjustability for me. I also used the same bike to commute on the road last summer too.  The one thing that does change though is my tires. I find my tread makes a huge difference. I try to match tread with terrain (when I can afford it)!

my two cents  thumbsup

bart
« Last Edit: April 20, 2010, 09:16:25 PM by bartspedden » Logged

Ommmmmmmmmmmmmmm
~ Siddhartha
  Pages: [1]
Reply New Topic New Poll
Jump to: