Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #100 on: May 18, 2012, 09:25:19 PM
|
Slowerthensnot
Have fun and go far
Location: Idledale, CO
Posts: 396
|
|
« Reply #100 on: May 18, 2012, 09:25:19 PM » |
|
running Panaracer driver 29er's this year, diff on the lighter end of the spectrum but put 1800 miles before one was having trubble sealing with slime pro ride around SW utah lotsa rocks and roads with lotsa crap on them
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #101 on: May 18, 2012, 10:06:24 PM
|
Foster
Location: Fort Campbell, KY
Posts: 296
|
|
« Reply #101 on: May 18, 2012, 10:06:24 PM » |
|
Tire setup complete. Saguaro TNT in front and Crossmark in back...got it to seat up with some different sealant that doesn't contain ammonia. Liking it so far.
Here are some thoughts on stans sealant and tire issues...
Stans has ammonia in it...and looking back on all my years in the Chem lab it will affect the strength of rubbers by slowly breaking down certain compounds that are used in some tires...such as a zinc oxidant that is used to increase rubber bonding strength of the tire. Ammonia is highly corrosive towards Zinc which after having stans in your tire for an extended period of time could lead to a dramatically reduced strength of the bead. This could explain problems with your Crossmark UST. To top it off, liquid ammonia is also corrosive to some rubber compounds.
Now this isn't necessarily a huge issue but I think for some tires this could be a problem, who knows, I am just postulating.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Go big or stay home
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #102 on: May 19, 2012, 01:15:31 AM
|
phil_rad
Location: Gelnhausen, Germany
Posts: 566
|
|
« Reply #102 on: May 19, 2012, 01:15:31 AM » |
|
I'm going with Saguaro's front and rear; also using Effetto mariposa's Cafe Latex, funny sounding name but the stuff works great. Even after 10 months of being in my tires, amazing stuff. Not using the TNT version as the normal one sets up easy and fast and is lighter; I used a floor pump to air them up. I also heard that they are an extremely tight fit on the Arch rims that I'm using. Almost impossible to get them off with cutting the tire. The normal ones are tight but still serviceable in the field. I know that there are lighter tires and more flashy looking tires, but the Geax line just plain works, never had an issue with one yet. Looking forward to seeing how they how up on the rigors of the Divide route. I've put 3000 miles on two different pairs and they still have enough tread to be ridden off-road.
Happy trails! Phil
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #103 on: May 19, 2012, 11:26:59 AM
|
Foster
Location: Fort Campbell, KY
Posts: 296
|
|
« Reply #103 on: May 19, 2012, 11:26:59 AM » |
|
I am really liking the saguaro and i am considering putting it on the back as well just because its so reliable. Also about the weight, an extra 100 grams for durability is not even a quarter pound. That much extra weight is worth it for some extra durability and piece of mind, especially since you won't notice it with how strong we all are...or are going to be 4 days into the race.
What I learned about tires this week Three things are of the importance for this race
1. Rolling resistance 2. Durability 3. Weight
You can really only pick 2 of these items. I choose rolling resistance and durability, which only added about 120 grams. I think I will be happy with this decision.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Go big or stay home
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #104 on: May 19, 2012, 02:14:34 PM
|
Rob Colliver
Posts: 83
|
|
« Reply #104 on: May 19, 2012, 02:14:34 PM » |
|
For all my training, I rode SB8's; with 10 days to go (whilst training in Fernie) I put on a new pair of the SB's and some new Stans liquid..... rode all the way to AW with no punctures. There was no tread left on the centre of the tyre by Silver City, but by then, who cares? There were a shedload of thorns poking through when I finally boxed the bike to take it home, again, who cares?
I weigh 155 lbs - this may have helped the tyres last so long.
I'd ride the race again with the same tyres, they were so surefooted and for the surfaces we ride on during the race, I could not fault them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #105 on: May 21, 2012, 10:16:12 AM
|
sniz
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #105 on: May 21, 2012, 10:16:12 AM » |
|
I am really liking the saguaro and i am considering putting it on the back as well just because its so reliable. Also about the weight, an extra 100 grams for durability is not even a quarter pound. That much extra weight is worth it for some extra durability and piece of mind, especially since you won't notice it with how strong we all are...or are going to be 4 days into the race.
What I learned about tires this week Three things are of the importance for this race
1. Rolling resistance 2. Durability 3. Weight
You can really only pick 2 of these items. I choose rolling resistance and durability, which only added about 120 grams. I think I will be happy with this decision.
Running the Saguaros 2.2 non-TNT front & back this year. Durability & rolling-resistance were the deciding factor, emphasis on durability. Super happy with the rolling resistance on these, very similar to the Nanos I was running for the past 6 months. Better to keep moving forward with slightly beefier tires than not moving forward with a slashed tire.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #106 on: May 22, 2012, 12:48:39 AM
|
pedalhead
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 18
|
|
« Reply #106 on: May 22, 2012, 12:48:39 AM » |
|
How are you Crossmark fans getting on with the non-UST version? I've sliced beyond repair FOUR of them in a single season riding my local trails. I do really like the fast rolling and fairly grippy Crossmark tread though so have been running a UST Crossmark on the back for a a few months now with no problems. I hadn't heard about the sealant/bubbling issue though...oops. Might have to put something else on there for upcoming races instead. There's quite a lot of loose flint where I ride, and this does tend to separate the men from the boys with regards to tyres. Race Kings, Snakeskin Ralphs and the UST Crossmark tend to hold up better than others I've tried so far.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #107 on: May 22, 2012, 03:35:30 AM
|
zkantor
Location: Israel
Posts: 20
|
|
« Reply #107 on: May 22, 2012, 03:35:30 AM » |
|
How are you Crossmark fans getting on with the non-UST version? ...
I can tell you that the LUST Crossmark is holding great flawlessly, though there is a weight penalty associated with this tyre. I agree that the non-LUST tends to get sliced, I had many issues with the delicate sidewalls of the tyre. My regular setup is therefore, LUST in the back and non-LUST in the front. In all my experience with Crossmark during the last years I never had issues with the sealant. I'm using Joe's no-flat. Hope it helps.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #108 on: May 22, 2012, 04:25:30 AM
|
mcmurv
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 85
|
|
« Reply #108 on: May 22, 2012, 04:25:30 AM » |
|
How are you Crossmark fans getting on with the non-UST version? I've sliced beyond repair FOUR of them in a single season riding my local trails. I do really like the fast rolling and fairly grippy Crossmark tread though so have been running a UST Crossmark on the back for a a few months now with no problems. I hadn't heard about the sealant/bubbling issue though...oops. Might have to put something else on there for upcoming races instead. There's quite a lot of loose flint where I ride, and this does tend to separate the men from the boys with regards to tyres. Race Kings, Snakeskin Ralphs and the UST Crossmark tend to hold up better than others I've tried so far.
Yikes, you must have some rocky trails. My very first pair of Crossmarks, I put 1,200 miles on them. During last summers TD and follow on riding, I put 2,200 miles on one pair. No repairs, no flats with Orange Seal Sealant. These were the non LUST Crossmarks.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #109 on: May 22, 2012, 06:11:06 AM
|
pedalhead
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 18
|
|
« Reply #109 on: May 22, 2012, 06:11:06 AM » |
|
yes the local flint is hard on sidewalls. In addition to the four Crossmarks, I've sliced a Nano, Ignitor, Mud-X, Ikon (£50 ouch) and Racing Ralph in the space of less than a year. Maybe I need to pay more attention to my line choice
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #110 on: May 22, 2012, 07:00:27 AM
|
BobM
Location: The Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan
Posts: 936
|
|
« Reply #110 on: May 22, 2012, 07:00:27 AM » |
|
yes the local flint is hard on sidewalls. In addition to the four Crossmarks, I've sliced a Nano, Ignitor, Mud-X, Ikon (£50 ouch) and Racing Ralph in the space of less than a year. Maybe I need to pay more attention to my line choice Could be a market in your area for stainless steel sidewall protectors.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #111 on: May 24, 2012, 01:59:38 PM
|
DocTrike
Adventure & Ultra tricyclist.
Location: Oregon
Posts: 113
|
|
« Reply #111 on: May 24, 2012, 01:59:38 PM » |
|
I have been testing the Schwalbe Rocket DD Ron, tubeless with DocBlue (stan's) last several days, I don't ever get flats but have chucked tires. I have been trying to flat these tires hitting railroad tracks , curbs, riding rail side in sharp deep quarry gravel, going through thorns and glass. So far they are perfect and even with extensive street use there holding up very well.
I want to try the Nobby Nic next.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ultra Adventure Triker, Digital Nomad
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #112 on: May 24, 2012, 10:37:12 PM
|
Georg66
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 128
|
|
« Reply #112 on: May 24, 2012, 10:37:12 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #113 on: May 25, 2012, 08:00:14 AM
|
pedalhead
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 18
|
|
« Reply #113 on: May 25, 2012, 08:00:14 AM » |
|
Ok I take it back about the LUST Crossmark...I put an unseal-able hole in it last night. In fairness, it was a little piece of flint resembling a shank...extremely sharp!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #114 on: May 31, 2012, 11:09:16 PM
|
vmjim
Location: Maryland
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #114 on: May 31, 2012, 11:09:16 PM » |
|
For all my training, I rode SB8's; with 10 days to go (whilst training in Fernie) I put on a new pair of the SB's and some new Stans liquid..... rode all the way to AW with no punctures. There was no tread left on the centre of the tyre by Silver City, but by then, who cares? There were a shedload of thorns poking through when I finally boxed the bike to take it home, again, who cares?
I weigh 155 lbs - this may have helped the tyres last so long.
I'd ride the race again with the same tyres, they were so surefooted and for the surfaces we ride on during the race, I could not fault them.
Are you riding the SB8 that are rates 80 PSI max with Stan's and what pressure do you ride at? Or, are you using the SB8 SCT (selent com patable tire) that are rated 50 psi max? I tried these and got a tread blister after 400 miles on my rear tire. I went back to the 80 psi type with a tube. I still have the SCT one with Stan's on the front. I could not get a replacement SCT in time for the TDR. Jim
|
|
« Last Edit: May 31, 2012, 11:20:50 PM by vmjim »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #115 on: June 01, 2012, 12:54:12 AM
|
Rob Colliver
Posts: 83
|
|
« Reply #115 on: June 01, 2012, 12:54:12 AM » |
|
I rode the 80psi tyres with double compound - I set off with the standard 'squeeze-the-tyre-and-it-feels-hard' psi - and 2.5 scoops of Stans jollop, and left well alone until beer time at AW.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #116 on: June 01, 2012, 01:14:28 AM
|
SimonK
Posts: 105
|
|
« Reply #116 on: June 01, 2012, 01:14:28 AM » |
|
I don't know about this whole Stans ammonia problem. Is it a myth? I've run the following tyres with Stans for a season at least, and no problems. Continental Explorer and Vertical Pro (non UST) Stans Crow and Raven Kenda Nevegal (non UST) Racing Ralph (non UST and not snakeskin - these took a week to seal well)
I had no punctures on the Great Divide (was running Crows).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #117 on: February 09, 2013, 02:23:23 AM
|
Veetack
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 77
|
|
« Reply #117 on: February 09, 2013, 02:23:23 AM » |
|
I'm kinda interested in making this thread resurface with the Grand Depart for 2013 Looming just months away. I'm about to change to Stans Crest rims, and I was thinking about the Racing Ralphs, but now I'm not so sure. May actually stick with Small Block 8s.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #118 on: February 09, 2013, 07:45:51 AM
|
krefs
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 492
|
|
« Reply #118 on: February 09, 2013, 07:45:51 AM » |
|
Racing Ralphs last about 500 miles for me on the front before the side knobs are about to tear off. On the rear, they last ~250 miles. And that's on an unloaded bike. You could get the "performance" model that supposedly uses a harder rubber compound, but in reality, that tire is far knobbier than you need for the GDMBR.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Topic Name: Tour Divide/GDMBR - tires
|
Reply #119 on: February 09, 2013, 01:04:31 PM
|
Veetack
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 77
|
|
« Reply #119 on: February 09, 2013, 01:04:31 PM » |
|
What did you use when you won it, Kurt? I thought I read something about Small Block 8s, which I'm considering just because I know they're fast rollers, but I'm a bit worried about grip especially in mud. For some reason I've hit a mental block trying to decide.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|